Players

Marcus Kemp 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
18	17	17	17	15	11

Career Honors

S133rd All-TMVL2nd All-PAC-8

S141st All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	17	.412	14	2	2	0.50	25	.920	0	0.00	1	.000	14.5	6.94
3	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	5	24	.333	5	1	2	0.25	17	.882	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.60
4	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	10	.600	8	2	2	0.67	14	.857	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.37
6	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	25	.320	4	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.91
10	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	2	17	.706	7	2	0	0.67	13	1.000	1	0.33	2	.500	17.0	8.45
12	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	5	21	.381	5	0	3	0.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.94
14	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	13	.769	24	4	1	1.33	29	.966	0	0.00	1	.000	15.5	8.23
16	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	0	15	.867	7	2	2	0.67	16	.875	2	0.67	3	.667	16.0	9.05
19	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	3	22	.682	10	2	4	0.50	21	.810	1	0.25	1	1.000	21.5	8.89
20	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	23	4.60	7	36	.444	13	5	4	1.00	25	.840	1	0.20	2	.500	29.5	8.99
22	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	7	28	.286	8	1	1	0.20	22	.955	1	0.20	1	1.000	17.5	7.18
23	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	4	22	.500	10	3	2	0.75	20	.900	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.57
27	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	1	19	.737	3	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.12
30	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	3	23	.522	10	5	0	1.00	24	1.000	2	0.40	3	.667	21.0	6.71
32	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	5	21	.476	3	2	4	0.67	13	.692	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.66
34	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	2	24	.625	9	2	3	0.50	21	.857	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.19
37	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	16	.625	2	1	1	0.25	12	.917	2	0.50	3	.667	13.0	5.60
39	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	0	18	.667	3	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.5	7.09
44	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	13	.462	5	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.55
Total		73	257	3.52	56	384	.523	150	35	37	0.48	343	.892	11	0.15	18	.611	315.0	7.58

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	1	5	6	0	1.50	10	2.50	9	2.24	17	0	1.000	14.5	6.94
3	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	8	2.00	11	2.47	17	1	.941	15.0	7.60
4	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	9	2.64	11	0	1.000	10.5	6.37
6	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	15	2.52	23	0	1.000	13.5	6.91
10	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	3	2.00	7	1	.857	17.0	8.45
12	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	10	2.33	15	2	.867	13.5	6.94
14	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	4	2.29	7	0	1.000	15.5	8.23
16	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	7	2.55	11	0	1.000	16.0	9.05
19	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	10	2.29	21	1	.952	21.5	8.89
20	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	16	2.57	23	1	.957	29.5	8.99
22	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	10	2.47	19	0	1.000	17.5	7.18
23	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	10	2.53	17	0	1.000	19.5	8.57
27	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	12	2.29	21	1	.952	16.0	7.12
30	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	16	2.43	23	1	.957	21.0	6.71
32	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	2.31	13	0	1.000	17.0	7.66
34	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	14	2.52	23	0	1.000	19.5	8.19
37	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	9	2.25	16	1	.938	13.0	5.60
39	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	5	1.25	9	2.36	14	1	.929	14.5	7.09
44	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	11	2.56	16	0	1.000	10.5	7.55
Total		73	2	42	44	0	0.60	78	1.07	193	2.42	314	10	.968	315.0	7.58