Players

Nolan Kaminski 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	17	16	17	16	8

Career Honors

S142nd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	22	.045	2	1	1	0.33	6	.833	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.05
2	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	12	.417	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	1	0.25	1	1.000	9.5	2.46
4	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	15	.400	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	7.5	4.71
5	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	28	.321	4	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.06
10	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	12	.083	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.14
12	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	13	.385	9	3	2	1.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.17
14	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	14	.571	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.81
15	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	11	.636	3	1	3	0.33	9	.667	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.08
17	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	9	18	-.278	6	0	4	0.00	12	.667	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.71
18	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	7	18	.000	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.65
21	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	5	15	-.067	4	0	4	0.00	12	.667	2	0.50	2	1.000	4.5	4.02
25	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	15	.400	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.88
26	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	2	30	.567	7	3	2	0.60	16	.875	.	.	.	.	25.5	6.91
29	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	1	18	.778	1	1	0	0.33	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.24
31	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	18	.111	8	1	2	0.25	16	.875	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.00
34	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	2	28	.500	6	1	1	0.25	15	.933	1	0.25	1	1.000	17.0	6.87
36	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	25	.360	3	0	2	0.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.30
39	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	15	.333	4	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.40
Total		64	161	2.52	58	327	.315	68	12	26	0.19	189	.862	4	0.06	5	.800	196.0	5.19

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	1.92	24	2	.917	7.0	3.05
2	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	4	1.00	10	1.72	29	5	.828	9.5	2.46
4	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	13	2.07	30	4	.867	7.5	4.71
5	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	16	2.19	27	4	.852	15.0	7.06
10	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	11	2.05	21	4	.810	4.5	3.14
12	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	7	2.18	17	1	.941	10.5	5.17
14	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	11	2.37	19	2	.895	8.5	5.81
15	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	8	2.67	6	1.80	20	4	.800	9.5	5.08
17	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	2	0.50	13	2.28	29	0	1.000	7.0	4.71
18	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	12	2.26	23	2	.913	7.5	4.65
21	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	15	2.30	27	1	.963	4.5	4.02
25	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	8	2.00	17	1	.941	10.0	5.88
26	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	4	0.80	15	1.88	41	6	.854	25.5	6.91
29	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	12	2.20	20	1	.950	18.5	8.24
31	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	13	2.06	32	4	.875	10.0	4.00
34	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	12	2.06	31	3	.903	17.0	6.87
36	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	22	2.34	44	0	1.000	14.5	5.30
39	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	11	2.43	21	0	1.000	9.5	6.40
Total		64	1	44	45	4	0.70	61	0.95	216	2.11	472	44	.907	196.0	5.19