Players

Nolan Kaminski 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	17	16	17	16	8

Season 12 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
334 12th	.476 78th	25 64th	96 52nd	53 109th

Career Honors

S142nd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	19	.474	10	1	3	0.25	18	.833	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.78
3	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	3	36	.389	7	0	4	0.00	17	.765	1	0.20	2	.500	19.5	8.46
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	17	.588	7	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	13.5	8.38
6	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	29	.310	1	0	4	0.00	9	.556	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.40
7	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	12	.500	4	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.70
9	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	7	31	.258	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	0	0.00	1	.000	16.0	6.88
10	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	13	.462	6	0	1	0.00	12	.917	0	0.00	1	.000	7.5	5.31
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	9	25	.000	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.0	5.73
14	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	0	22	.636	5	1	1	0.33	10	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	16.5	8.71
15	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	19	6.33	3	25	.640	3	2	0	0.67	10	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	23.5	9.26
17	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	13	.538	11	2	2	0.50	19	.895	1	0.25	1	1.000	10.5	4.43
18	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	15	.267	6	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	11.5	8.11
21	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	4	33	.424	9	3	1	0.75	18	.944	.	.	.	.	22.0	8.83
22	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	18	6.00	2	26	.615	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.31
26	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	13	.538	4	0	4	0.00	10	.600	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.82
27	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	20	.450	1	1	2	0.25	8	.750	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.74
29	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	3	32	.531	5	2	1	0.40	13	.923	0	0.00	1	.000	23.5	7.40
30	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	1	21	.810	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	18.0	6.59
34	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	6	25	.280	9	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.74
37	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	14	.643	8	2	0	0.67	15	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	14.0	7.90
39	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	5	22	.455	10	2	0	0.50	19	1.000	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.60
42	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	1	13	.692	5	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	12.0	3.57
44	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	17	.529	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	1	0.33	1	1.000	13.0	7.15
45	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	18	.722	6	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.31
47	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	20	4.00	3	29	.586	8	2	0	0.40	17	1.000	1	0.20	1	1.000	22.0	6.65
Total		92	334	3.63	77	540	.476	140	25	33	0.27	322	.898	9	0.10	14	.643	387.0	7.11

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 12)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	1	0.50	4	1.00	15	2.18	34	2	.941	14.5	6.78
3	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	8	1.60	12	2.67	18	0	1.000	19.5	8.46
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	12	2.26	23	1	.957	13.5	8.38
6	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	18	2.85	20	0	1.000	14.0	7.40
7	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	4	2.22	9	0	1.000	9.0	5.70
9	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	8	2.26	19	0	1.000	16.0	6.88
10	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	10	2.09	22	1	.955	7.5	5.31
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	8	2.24	17	1	.941	9.0	5.73
14	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	14	2.32	25	1	.960	16.5	8.71
15	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	7	2.33	6	2.27	11	1	.909	23.5	9.26
17	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	10	2.06	33	1	.970	10.5	4.43
18	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	9	2.62	13	0	1.000	11.5	8.11
21	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	12	2.35	20	0	1.000	22.0	8.83
22	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	11	2.08	24	3	.875	19.5	8.31
26	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	6	2.50	10	0	1.000	12.0	7.82
27	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	15	2.36	22	2	.909	16.0	6.74
29	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	21	2.19	42	3	.929	23.5	7.40
30	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	15	2.06	35	3	.914	18.0	6.59
34	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	13	2.14	22	4	.818	14.5	6.74
37	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	9	2.29	21	1	.952	14.0	7.90
39	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	16	2.19	31	1	.968	18.5	7.60
42	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	14	2.00	32	5	.844	12.0	3.57
44	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	14	2.08	26	3	.885	13.0	7.15
45	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	7	1.93	15	2	.867	17.0	7.31
47	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	18	2.00	39	8	.795	22.0	6.65
Total		92	3	50	53	3	0.58	96	1.04	297	2.21	583	43	.926	387.0	7.11