Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	6	1	2	0.33	13	.846	30	10.00	65	.462	6.0	6.49
5	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	4	.000	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	45	11.25	90	.500	2.5	6.08
8	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	6	-.167	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	27	9.00	73	.370	1.0	4.11
10	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	5	0	1	0.00	13	.923	22	7.33	52	.423	2.5	4.20
14	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	4	2	4	0.67	12	.667	23	7.67	62	.371	3.0	3.48
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	5	.400	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	38	12.67	54	.704	3.5	8.24
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	12	2	3	0.50	23	.870	42	10.50	76	.553	7.0	7.64
18	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	7	3	3	1.00	16	.813	29	9.67	55	.527	5.5	5.70
21	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	6	.167	12	4	3	0.80	25	.880	45	9.00	89	.506	8.0	5.65
22	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.33	12	.917	29	9.67	66	.439	2.0	5.11
29	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	2	.500	3	0	5	0.00	18	.722	59	11.80	105	.562	4.0	7.67
Total		39	11	0.28	3	41	.195	63	13	25	0.33	165	.848	389	9.97	787	.494	45.0	5.85

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	0	2.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.49
5	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.08
8	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.11
10	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.20
14	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.48
15	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.24
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	1	6	7	0	1.75	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.64
18	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.70
21	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.65
22	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.11
29	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.67
Total		39	2	38	40	2	1.03	39	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	45.0	5.85