Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	.375	0.0	6.75
5	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	7	.000	0.0	5.05
8	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	2.60
11	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	3.38
13	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	3	0.50	14	.786	4	1.00	10	.400	2.0	4.43
15	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	3.50
18	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	4.05
29	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	2.70
Total		25	.	.	.	.	.	11	2	5	0.08	36	.861	19	0.76	49	.388	2.0	4.06

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	2.37	19	2	.895	0.0	6.75
5	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	10	1.96	23	2	.913	0.0	5.05
8	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10	1.88	25	3	.880	0.0	2.60
11	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	13	1.96	27	5	.815	0.0	3.38
13	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	11	1.61	38	8	.789	2.0	4.43
15	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.09	22	3	.864	0.0	3.50
18	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	15	2.22	27	3	.889	0.0	4.05
29	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14	1.88	32	7	.781	0.0	2.70
Total		25	.	.	.	.	.	25	1.00	95	1.96	213	33	.845	2.0	4.06