Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	2	1.000	0.0	5.25
5	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	8	.500	0.0	5.80
9	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	5.65
10	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	9	.889	0.0	6.01
11	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	9	.333	0.0	5.35
12	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	.375	0.0	4.05
15	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	.375	0.0	8.78
18	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	6.75
22	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	1.60
29	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	8	.375	0.0	5.80
Total		36	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	31	0.86	62	.500	0.0	5.50

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	15	2.15	26	4	.846	0.0	5.25
5	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	16	2.09	34	3	.912	0.0	5.80
9	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	2.20	15	0	1.000	0.0	5.65
10	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	15	2.00	28	5	.821	0.0	6.01
11	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	20	2.05	41	8	.805	0.0	5.35
12	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	2.07	14	0	1.000	0.0	4.05
15	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	12	2.60	15	0	1.000	0.0	8.78
18	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	2.43	14	1	.929	0.0	6.75
22	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	1.60	30	7	.767	0.0	1.60
29	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	8	2.13	15	1	.933	0.0	5.80
Total		36	.	.	.	.	.	66	1.83	116	2.08	232	29	.875	0.0	5.50