Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	6	1	2	0.33	14	.857	35	11.67	58	.603	2.5	6.96
5	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	3	0.00	16	.813	46	11.50	92	.500	0.5	6.15
7	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	4	.000	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	24	8.00	59	.407	2.0	3.32
10	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	3	.000	7	1	3	0.25	19	.842	39	9.75	88	.443	2.0	4.79
14	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	7	1	2	0.33	16	.875	40	13.33	70	.571	1.0	8.34
15	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	7	.000	12	1	5	0.25	23	.783	52	13.00	102	.510	2.0	8.13
17	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	2	.500	5	1	2	0.25	16	.875	43	10.75	96	.448	2.5	5.60
18	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	1	1.000	13	3	4	0.75	23	.826	51	12.75	79	.646	4.5	8.86
22	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	1	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	36	12.00	63	.571	1.0	6.19
31	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	6	.167	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	34	11.33	67	.507	2.0	6.14
34	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	5	.600	6	2	4	0.50	18	.778	57	14.25	93	.613	6.5	9.70
Total		39	12	0.31	5	35	.200	69	10	28	0.26	175	.840	457	11.72	867	.527	26.5	6.74

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.96
5	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	6.15
7	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.32
10	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.79
14	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.34
15	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.13
17	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.60
18	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.86
22	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	6.19
31	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.14
34	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	9.70
Total		39	0	9	9	1	0.23	41	1.05	.	.	.	.	.	26.5	6.74