Players

Nathan Myers 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	14	13	3	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	11	.273	8	4	2	1.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.68
6	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	15	.267	4	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.09
7	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	0	8	.875	12	1	2	0.25	20	.900	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.85
9	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	6	-.167	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.30
10	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	12	.583	5	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.98
13	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	4	12	.000	8	0	1	0.00	18	.944	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.33
14	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	1	9	.444	11	4	2	0.80	19	.895	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.74
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	9	.778	8	3	2	1.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.94
18	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	12	.667	12	2	3	0.50	22	.864	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.63
21	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	1	18	.722	12	3	2	0.75	22	.909	.	.	.	.	19.0	9.17
22	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	13	-.077	3	2	1	0.67	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.03
25	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	4	6	-.333	5	2	1	0.50	13	.923	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.05
26	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	3	11	.182	2	0	5	0.00	15	.667	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.23
29	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	13	.308	6	0	2	0.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.64
34	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	13	.000	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.76
39	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	2	15	.600	5	2	2	0.40	16	.875	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.70
44	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	16	.125	8	1	3	0.25	17	.824	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.18
Total		66	109	1.65	43	199	.332	113	24	29	0.36	257	.887	.	.	.	.	165.5	6.19

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.68
6	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.09
7	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.85
9	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.30
10	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.98
13	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.33
14	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.74
17	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.94
18	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.63
21	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	9.17
22	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.03
25	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.05
26	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.23
29	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.64
34	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.76
39	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	9	9	0	1.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.70
44	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	1	8	9	0	2.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.18
Total		66	1	63	64	8	0.97	26	0.39	.	.	.	.	.	165.5	6.19