Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	1	9	.444	1	1	2	0.20	10	.800	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.86
4	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	8	-.250	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.29
9	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	12	.333	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.58
15	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	7	-.143	3	1	3	0.33	8	.625	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.78
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	1	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.26
23	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	6	-.167	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.95
25	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	5	-.200	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.69
26	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	6	13	-.385	12	0	3	0.00	22	.864	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.14
33	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	6	-.167	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.18
Total		31	17	0.55	21	69	-.058	31	5	17	0.16	95	.821	.	.	.	.	33.5	3.64

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	2	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.86
4	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.29
9	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.58
15	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.78
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.26
23	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0	2	2	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.95
25	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.69
26	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.14
33	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.18
Total		31	3	17	20	5	0.65	5	0.16	.	.	.	.	.	33.5	3.64