Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	12	.167	0.0	3.85
4	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	.286	0.0	3.95
9	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	7	.143	0.0	6.28
11	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	3.05
15	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	.444	0.0	4.36
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	2.25
23	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	2.50
25	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	2.95
26	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	8	.375	0.0	3.10
33	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	1.25
Total		34	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	21	0.62	63	.333	0.0	3.35

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	10	1.75	32	5	.844	0.0	3.85
4	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	1.67	24	5	.792	0.0	3.95
9	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	11	2.03	35	1	.971	0.0	6.28
11	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	1.89	27	3	.889	0.0	3.05
15	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	5	1.38	21	7	.667	0.0	4.36
17	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	1.72	32	7	.781	0.0	2.25
23	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	12	1.83	24	5	.792	0.0	2.50
25	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	8	1.95	20	3	.850	0.0	2.95
26	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	14	1.95	38	4	.895	0.0	3.10
33	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	5	1.48	25	7	.720	0.0	1.25
Total		34	.	.	.	.	.	46	1.35	92	1.78	278	47	.831	0.0	3.35