Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	5.20
2	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	6	.167	0.0	5.65
3	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	12	.167	0.0	5.65
6	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	5.20
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	3.95
12	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	13	.385	0.0	5.90
15	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	8	.000	0.0	6.18
19	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	3.05
33	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	5.50
Total		30	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14	0.47	62	.226	0.0	5.14

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	2.05	20	0	1.000	0.0	5.20
2	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	2.38	13	0	1.000	0.0	5.65
3	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	16	2.19	31	2	.935	0.0	5.65
6	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	2.00	20	1	.950	0.0	5.20
9	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	1.86	14	2	.857	0.0	3.95
12	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	15	2.42	24	1	.958	0.0	5.90
15	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	5	2.15	13	0	1.000	0.0	6.18
19	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	2.00	27	2	.926	0.0	3.05
33	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	2.15	13	1	.923	0.0	5.50
Total		30	.	.	.	.	.	54	1.80	84	2.14	175	9	.949	0.0	5.14