Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3	3	1.00	16	.813	0	0.00	4	.000	3.0	7.36
6	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	2	0.20	13	.846	5	1.00	16	.313	1.0	7.05
9	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	3	1.00	12	.250	0.0	3.40
12	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	8.58
15	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	5	1.67	8	.625	0.0	8.17
17	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	3	0.00	10	.700	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	7.43
25	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	3	0.25	17	.824	3	0.75	7	.429	1.0	5.28
26	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.25	14	.857	6	1.50	8	.750	1.0	8.54
31	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	3	1.00	4	.750	0.0	4.15
34	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	11	.273	0.0	7.56
Total		36	.	.	.	.	.	40	6	16	0.17	96	.833	31	0.86	77	.403	6.0	6.75

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	9	2.06	16	3	.813	3.0	7.36
6	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	10	2.22	18	1	.944	1.0	7.05
9	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	2.00	10	1	.900	0.0	3.40
12	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	13	2.50	18	1	.944	0.0	8.58
15	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	8	2.33	18	0	1.000	0.0	8.17
17	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	2.44	18	0	1.000	0.0	7.43
25	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	8	2.31	16	1	.938	1.0	5.28
26	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	10	2.24	21	1	.952	1.0	8.54
31	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.18	17	3	.824	0.0	4.15
34	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	13	2.35	23	1	.957	0.0	7.56
Total		36	.	.	.	.	.	89	2.47	97	2.28	175	12	.931	6.0	6.75