Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
6	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	.375	0.0	4.73
9	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	4	1.000	1	0.33	8	.125	0.0	3.50
12	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	3.50
15	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	10	.500	0.0	4.95
18	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	8	.625	0.0	6.13
21	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	1	0.00	14	.929	5	1.25	12	.417	0.0	6.06
25	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	2.50
30	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	3.40
35	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	10	.500	0.0	8.15
40	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	2	0.00	13	.846	6	1.50	8	.750	0.0	6.54
Total		36	.	.	.	.	.	14	0	4	0.00	36	.889	34	0.94	78	.436	0.0	4.95

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
6	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	16	2.33	27	2	.926	0.0	4.73
9	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	2.09	23	0	1.000	0.0	3.50
12	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	2.00	28	2	.929	0.0	3.50
15	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	12	1.86	35	2	.943	0.0	4.95
18	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	8	2.05	21	1	.952	0.0	6.13
21	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	7	1.76	17	4	.765	0.0	6.06
25	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	1.86	28	3	.893	0.0	2.50
30	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	13	1.97	30	4	.867	0.0	3.40
35	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	13	2.17	23	3	.870	0.0	8.15
40	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	13	2.03	30	2	.933	0.0	6.54
Total		36	.	.	.	.	.	74	2.06	111	2.01	262	23	.912	0.0	4.95