Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	17	5.67	57	.298	0.0	1.00
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	2	0	2	0.00	9	.778	24	8.00	62	.387	0.0	2.40
12	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	25	8.33	69	.362	1.0	3.27
15	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	6	0	3	0.00	14	.786	39	13.00	77	.506	0.5	8.28
18	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	8	.375	8	1	5	0.20	20	.750	55	11.00	108	.509	5.0	6.24
22	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	5	.000	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	30	10.00	57	.526	1.5	4.58
26	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	8	.000	2	0	4	0.00	10	.600	36	12.00	67	.537	1.0	5.96
31	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	5	.800	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	28	9.33	67	.418	5.5	5.90
41	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	1	6	-.167	7	0	5	0.00	21	.762	60	12.00	95	.632	2.0	6.95
44	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	2	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	36	12.00	63	.571	2.5	6.82
Total		34	11	0.32	4	48	.146	32	1	27	0.03	119	.773	350	10.29	722	.485	19.0	5.14

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.00
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	2.40
12	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.27
15	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	8.28
18	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.24
22	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.58
26	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.96
31	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.90
41	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.95
44	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.82
Total		34	0	14	14	2	0.41	21	0.62	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	5.14