Players

Cooper Hinrichs 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	13	15	14	14	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	26	.231	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.70
3	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	11	.091	6	0	2	0.00	12	.833	1	0.33	1	1.000	4.0	3.41
5	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	17	.412	3	1	4	0.25	12	.667	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	5.32
6	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	13	.615	4	0	5	0.00	12	.583	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.84
7	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	5	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.55
8	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	8	.500	5	1	1	0.33	10	.900	1	0.33	1	1.000	6.5	2.80
14	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	5	23	.522	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	18.0	8.30
17	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	16	.125	2	0	3	0.00	12	.750	1	0.25	1	1.000	7.5	4.25
19	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	2	23	.435	4	3	1	0.60	14	.929	1	0.20	1	1.000	15.0	4.25
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	6	29	.379	13	1	4	0.20	24	.833	.	.	.	.	21.5	7.97
22	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	17	.471	5	1	4	0.25	14	.714	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.39
31	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	13	.462	6	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.17
32	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	17	.118	4	1	0	0.25	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	3.27
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	9	2	2	0.67	15	.867	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.43
36	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	15	.400	5	0	4	0.00	14	.714	0	0.00	2	.000	11.5	4.02
39	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	8	18	-.111	5	1	4	0.25	14	.714	1	0.25	2	.500	11.5	3.52
41	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	10	.000	4	2	1	0.67	10	.900	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.52
44	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	0	27	.741	5	0	1	0.00	15	.933	0	0.00	1	.000	22.0	7.52
46	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	19	.263	8	3	3	0.60	20	.850	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.28
Total		75	168	2.24	55	315	.359	102	17	46	0.23	259	.822	5	0.07	10	.500	216.0	5.03

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	11	1.94	33	3	.909	12.0	4.70
3	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	12	1.94	32	6	.813	4.0	3.41
5	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	1	0.25	7	2.23	13	1	.923	13.0	5.32
6	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	14	2.00	30	5	.833	10.5	4.84
7	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	8	2.67	12	2.26	19	2	.895	9.5	6.55
8	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	6	1.72	18	3	.833	6.5	2.80
14	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	14	2.27	26	0	1.000	18.0	8.30
17	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	9	2.22	18	1	.944	7.5	4.25
19	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	15	2.07	30	2	.933	15.0	4.25
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	5	1.00	13	2.32	22	1	.955	21.5	7.97
22	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	22	2.05	42	5	.881	12.5	5.39
31	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	10	2.11	19	1	.947	9.5	6.17
32	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	14	2.06	35	4	.886	7.5	3.27
34	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	6	2.06	16	0	1.000	5.0	4.43
36	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	3	0.60	14	2.15	26	3	.885	11.5	4.02
39	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	9	9	0	2.25	2	0.50	10	1.89	28	3	.893	11.5	3.52
41	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	12	2.29	21	1	.952	6.5	4.52
44	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	2	0.80	2	0.40	20	2.20	35	4	.886	22.0	7.52
46	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	20	2.23	39	2	.949	12.5	4.28
Total		75	1	60	61	4	0.81	75	1.00	241	2.10	502	47	.906	216.0	5.03