Players

Declan Ayers 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	12	12	14	13	3

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	11	-.091	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.69
3	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	1	24	.625	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	21.5	7.01
4	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	29	.241	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.12
5	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	26	.192	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.54
6	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	7	30	.067	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.28
8	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	19	.158	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.37
9	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	7	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.51
11	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	19	.316	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.42
13	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	20	.300	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.00
15	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	26	.385	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.70
16	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	13	.385	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.54
17	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	6	24	.125	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.16
18	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	6	21	.143	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.20
21	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	2	10	-.100	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.96
23	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	6	22	-.045	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.25
25	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	14	.357	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.62
28	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	6	26	.231	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.92
33	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	10	.100	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.49
34	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	24	.417	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.20
Total		75	154	2.05	68	375	.229	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	200.5	5.05

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	NA	NA	21	5	.762	3.0	1.69
3	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	8	1.60	NA	NA	25	2	.920	21.5	7.01
4	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	7	1.75	NA	NA	28	2	.929	12.5	6.12
5	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	NA	NA	23	3	.870	11.0	4.54
6	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	13	2.60	NA	NA	34	0	1.000	10.5	6.28
8	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	6	2.00	NA	NA	21	1	.952	12.0	7.37
9	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	NA	NA	22	2	.909	7.0	4.51
11	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	1	7	8	0	1.60	8	1.60	NA	NA	35	3	.914	13.5	5.42
13	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	12	4.00	NA	NA	22	0	1.000	9.0	7.00
15	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	NA	NA	12	1	.917	14.5	7.70
16	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	NA	NA	23	2	.913	6.0	3.54
17	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	6	1.20	NA	NA	32	5	.844	11.0	3.16
18	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	10	2.00	NA	NA	25	3	.880	11.0	3.20
21	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	10	2.00	NA	NA	31	2	.935	5.5	4.96
23	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	NA	NA	41	6	.854	9.5	3.25
25	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	8	2.67	NA	NA	17	4	.765	8.5	4.62
28	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	10	2.00	NA	NA	38	3	.921	15.0	5.92
33	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	NA	NA	21	2	.905	6.5	3.49
34	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	NA	NA	33	3	.909	13.0	6.20
Total		75	3	47	50	2	0.67	141	1.88	0	0.00	504	49	.903	200.5	5.05