Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	4	.750	7	1	2	0.33	14	.857	19	6.33	68	.279	4.5	3.92
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	19	6.33	45	.422	0.0	2.24
7	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	15	5.00	65	.231	1.0	1.68
10	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	5	.200	4	0	3	0.00	16	.813	41	10.25	87	.471	2.5	5.22
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	1	0	4	0.00	9	.556	19	6.33	47	.404	1.0	1.64
19	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	22	7.33	56	.393	1.0	1.96
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	2	1	3	0.33	10	.700	29	9.67	61	.475	2.5	4.34
30	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	5	2	4	0.67	14	.714	33	11.00	63	.524	3.0	5.79
34	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	7	3	2	0.60	20	.900	53	10.60	98	.541	5.0	5.38
Total		30	10	0.33	3	29	.241	32	7	24	0.23	109	.780	250	8.33	590	.424	20.5	3.57

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	3.92
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	2.24
7	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.68
10	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.22
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.64
19	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.96
25	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.34
30	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.79
34	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.38
Total		30	0	7	7	2	0.23	19	0.63	.	.	.	.	.	20.5	3.57