Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	16	5.33	68	.235	0.0	1.52
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	6	2	1	0.67	12	.917	15	5.00	49	.306	3.0	2.94
8	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	7	.143	5	3	0	1.00	10	1.000	16	5.33	63	.254	4.0	2.80
12	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	5	1	3	0.33	13	.769	23	7.67	55	.418	1.5	3.62
14	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	3	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	21	7.00	60	.350	1.0	2.38
21	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	2	.500	5	0	2	0.00	16	.875	39	9.75	97	.402	2.0	5.54
22	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	5	-.200	6	1	3	0.33	11	.727	30	10.00	64	.469	2.0	4.86
29	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	26	8.67	66	.394	2.0	4.07
34	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	4	1	2	0.33	12	.833	34	11.33	64	.531	1.0	5.44
Total		28	6	0.21	4	30	.067	36	8	14	0.29	99	.859	220	7.86	586	.375	16.5	3.69

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.52
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.94
8	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.80
12	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.62
14	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.38
21	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.54
22	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.86
29	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.07
34	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.44
Total		28	0	5	5	2	0.18	24	0.86	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	3.69