Players

Lachlan Forrester 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	16	16	17	15	5

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	21	.238	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	10.5	5.35
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	16	.438	9	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.0	6.83
4	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	30	.200	3	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.52
6	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	18	.111	7	1	0	0.33	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.18
7	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	23	4.60	5	37	.486	6	0	4	0.00	14	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	25.5	8.29
8	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	18	.500	8	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.30
11	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	6	20	.100	5	1	3	0.33	11	.727	0	0.00	1	.000	9.5	4.89
14	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	25	5.00	5	42	.476	5	1	5	0.20	15	.667	0	0.00	1	.000	29.0	7.92
15	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	22	.273	3	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.62
17	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	9	30	.133	5	2	2	0.50	12	.833	1	0.25	1	1.000	16.5	7.19
18	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	17	.706	4	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.83
21	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	20	.500	5	2	2	0.67	12	.833	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.80
25	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	4	27	.407	6	0	1	0.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.34
26	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	2	22	.636	9	1	1	0.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	18.0	9.37
29	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	2	17	.412	8	2	5	0.40	20	.750	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.33
30	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	21	5.25	9	43	.279	6	0	4	0.00	14	.714	3	0.75	3	1.000	22.5	7.72
34	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	29	.069	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.0	2.92
40	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	4	29	.414	1	1	0	0.25	10	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	18.0	5.45
Total		66	236	3.58	77	458	.347	95	12	38	0.18	228	.833	6	0.09	10	.600	269.5	6.83

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	8	2.00	9	2.06	17	1	.941	10.5	5.35
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	8	2.06	17	2	.882	10.0	6.83
4	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	12	3.00	14	2.25	32	2	.938	12.0	6.52
6	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	9	2.04	24	0	1.000	8.5	5.18
7	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	5	1.00	17	2.27	33	1	.970	25.5	8.29
8	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	7	2.14	14	2	.857	13.0	8.30
11	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	12	1.93	28	2	.929	9.5	4.89
14	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	5	1.00	18	2.00	43	4	.907	29.0	7.92
15	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	21	2.38	37	2	.946	13.5	7.62
17	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	18	2.26	31	3	.903	16.5	7.19
18	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	6	2.00	9	2.43	14	1	.929	14.0	8.83
21	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	11	2.27	22	1	.955	13.5	7.80
25	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	8	2.00	16	2.32	25	1	.960	17.0	8.34
26	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	11	2.50	16	1	.938	18.0	9.37
29	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	8	1.60	21	2.12	42	6	.857	11.5	4.33
30	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	3	0.75	12	1.96	27	4	.852	22.5	7.72
34	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	13	1.88	34	6	.824	7.0	2.92
40	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	.	.	13	1.78	36	6	.833	18.0	5.45
Total		66	1	41	42	4	0.64	84	1.27	239	2.13	492	45	.909	269.5	6.83