Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	3.40
4	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	1	0.00	14	.929	4	1.33	10	.400	0.0	5.51
7	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	3	0.25	17	.824	0	0.00	1	.000	1.0	3.18
10	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	11	.909	0	0.00	3	.000	1.0	3.95
15	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	2	0.33	13	.846	6	2.00	7	.857	1.0	5.96
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	2	0.67	7	.286	0.0	5.10
25	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	1	0.67	9	.889	3	1.00	6	.500	2.0	4.30
26	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	5.85
29	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	9	.667	5	1.67	7	.714	0.0	6.08
Total		28	.	.	.	.	.	30	5	14	0.18	89	.843	23	0.82	52	.442	5.0	4.81

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	2.22	23	1	.957	0.0	3.40
4	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	14	1.97	31	4	.871	0.0	5.51
7	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	11	1.93	30	1	.967	1.0	3.18
10	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	1.92	24	2	.917	1.0	3.95
15	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	1.95	20	2	.900	1.0	5.96
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	2.00	15	2	.867	0.0	5.10
25	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.10	20	1	.950	2.0	4.30
26	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	17	2.37	27	2	.926	0.0	5.85
29	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	12	2.26	23	2	.913	0.0	6.08
Total		28	.	.	.	.	.	39	1.39	97	2.08	213	17	.920	5.0	4.81