Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	9	1	1	0.33	15	.933	32	10.67	68	.471	4.5	7.84
2	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	2	0	1	0.00	6	.833	24	8.00	66	.364	1.0	3.22
3	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	6	.333	4	2	2	0.67	8	.750	19	6.33	77	.247	4.5	2.74
6	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	8	.125	4	0	3	0.00	9	.667	19	6.33	56	.339	1.5	2.78
9	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	7	2	2	0.67	13	.846	21	7.00	59	.356	2.5	3.50
10	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	4	5	-.800	4	0	3	0.00	13	.769	41	10.25	95	.432	0.5	4.82
15	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	3	8	-.375	9	1	1	0.20	18	.944	46	9.20	96	.479	3.0	5.19
21	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	3	7	-.429	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	31	10.33	71	.437	2.0	5.23
26	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	7	.143	4	1	3	0.20	13	.769	58	11.60	103	.563	4.0	6.48
34	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	5	0	3	0.00	12	.750	33	11.00	55	.600	1.5	5.86
Total		35	7	0.20	12	52	-.096	50	7	21	0.20	115	.817	324	9.26	746	.434	25.0	4.77

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.84
2	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.22
3	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.74
6	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.78
9	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.50
10	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	4.82
15	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	10	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.19
21	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.23
26	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.48
34	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.86
Total		35	4	14	18	3	0.51	39	1.11	.	.	.	.	.	25.0	4.77