Players

Valentin Campos 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	15	16	4	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	7	.286	6	1	0	0.33	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.55
3	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	1	13	.462	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.49
4	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	11	.273	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.06
6	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	2	19	.526	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.06
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	5	.200	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
9	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	10	.300	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.02
11	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	11	.364	5	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.89
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	3	11	.182	2	0	4	0.00	15	.733	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.27
13	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	5	17	.235	1	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.95
16	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	5	15	.133	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.49
19	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	14	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.13
22	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	0	15	.800	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.32
30	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	18	3.60	4	24	.583	5	0	1	0.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	20.0	7.97
33	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	8	.125	5	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.26
35	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	9	.778	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.05
38	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	0	14	.857	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.47
39	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	17	.471	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.68
40	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.02
44	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	9	.778	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.40
45	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	13	.692	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.45
Total		76	161	2.12	45	251	.462	24	1	11	0.01	86	.872	.	.	.	.	198.0	5.74

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.55
3	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.49
4	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.06
6	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.06
7	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
9	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.02
11	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.89
12	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.27
13	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.95
16	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.49
19	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	8.13
22	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	1	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.32
30	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	7.97
33	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.26
35	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.05
38	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.47
39	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.68
40	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.02
44	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.40
45	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	0	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	9.45
Total		76	4	64	68	7	0.89	7	0.09	.	.	.	.	.	198.0	5.74