Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	2	0.67	7	.286	1.0	5.63
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	5	1.25	11	.455	0.0	8.96
8	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	4	1.33	9	.444	0.0	6.26
10	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	10	.200	0.0	7.23
14	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	4.95
15	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.25	15	.933	3	0.75	6	.500	1.0	7.14
17	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	4	0.20	15	.733	8	1.60	14	.571	1.0	7.16
18	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	7.65
21	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	5.10
25	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	6	1.50	14	.429	1.0	9.47
26	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	6.66
29	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	3	1.00	8	.375	0.0	5.50
30	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	5	3	1.00	25	.880	4	0.80	7	.571	5.0	6.90
34	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	3	1	0.75	20	.950	2	0.50	5	.400	3.0	5.70
39	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	1	0.50	13	.923	2	0.50	3	.667	2.0	4.70
40	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	2	0.33	12	.833	3	1.00	4	.750	1.0	4.00
Total		59	.	.	.	.	.	64	15	22	0.25	183	.880	52	0.88	116	.448	15.0	6.44

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.00	24	1	.958	1.0	5.63
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	14	2.63	19	0	1.000	0.0	8.96
8	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	2.67	12	0	1.000	0.0	6.26
10	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	12	2.45	22	0	1.000	0.0	7.23
14	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	1.95	20	2	.900	0.0	4.95
15	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	7	1.84	19	2	.895	1.0	7.14
17	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	9	2.44	16	0	1.000	1.0	7.16
18	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	11	2.08	25	1	.960	0.0	7.65
21	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	10	1.84	25	3	.880	0.0	5.10
25	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	14	3.50	14	2.43	21	1	.952	1.0	9.47
26	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	2.80	10	0	1.000	0.0	6.66
29	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	2.20	10	1	.900	0.0	5.50
30	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	28	2.34	50	2	.960	5.0	6.90
34	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	6	2.08	13	0	1.000	3.0	5.70
39	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	9	2.25	16	1	.938	2.0	4.70
40	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	16	2.12	33	2	.939	1.0	4.00
Total		59	.	.	.	.	.	117	1.98	176	2.23	335	16	.952	15.0	6.44