Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	2	0.67	7	.286	0.0	9.04
6	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	4	2	1.00	17	.882	6	1.50	9	.667	4.0	2.82
7	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	.364	0.0	8.41
8	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	5.75
11	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	10	.600	0.0	7.48
12	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	5	.400	0.0	4.80
14	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	6.86
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	.500	0.0	4.18
17	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	9	.556	0.0	5.40
19	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	5.53
21	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	8.33
22	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	8.59
25	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	9	.778	4	0.80	9	.444	0.0	5.58
26	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	1	0.40	19	.947	8	1.60	14	.571	2.0	4.93
29	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	3.40
33	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	13	.923	3	1.00	6	.500	1.0	6.23
34	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	2	0.25	16	.875	1	0.25	3	.333	1.0	4.65
35	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	5.65
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	2.95
44	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	1.000	0.0	5.08
45	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	7	.857	0.0	5.23
Total		76	.	.	.	.	.	40	8	11	0.11	102	.892	68	0.89	133	.511	8.0	5.76

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	10	2.64	14	0	1.000	0.0	9.04
6	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	3	1.28	18	5	.722	4.0	2.82
7	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	3	2.75	4	0	1.000	0.0	8.41
8	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	12	2.19	26	2	.923	0.0	5.75
11	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	16	2.56	25	0	1.000	0.0	7.48
12	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	10	2.05	21	4	.810	0.0	4.80
14	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	6	2.33	12	0	1.000	0.0	6.86
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	1.88	17	3	.824	0.0	4.18
17	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	10	2.38	21	0	1.000	0.0	5.40
19	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	5	1.80	15	0	1.000	0.0	5.53
21	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	2.69	13	0	1.000	0.0	8.33
22	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	2.64	11	0	1.000	0.0	8.59
25	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	12	2.33	18	1	.944	0.0	5.58
26	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	13	2.25	28	0	1.000	2.0	4.93
29	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	17	2.29	31	3	.903	0.0	3.40
33	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	18	2.21	33	4	.879	1.0	6.23
34	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	12	2.32	22	0	1.000	1.0	4.65
35	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	8	2.24	17	1	.941	0.0	5.65
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	2.00	23	4	.826	0.0	2.95
44	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	17	1.91	34	7	.794	0.0	5.08
45	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	19	2.45	29	2	.931	0.0	5.23
Total		76	.	.	.	.	.	121	1.59	225	2.21	432	36	.917	8.0	5.76