Players

Aaron Murphy 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	14	11	16	9	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	18	6.00	0	23	.783	11	0	1	0.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	19.0	9.13
3	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	4	31	.484	8	0	0	0.00	21	1.000	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.41
5	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	21	.381	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.84
6	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	3	27	.519	6	2	2	0.40	19	.895	1	0.20	2	.500	19.5	6.22
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	12	.667	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	4.60
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	17	.412	7	2	4	0.67	15	.733	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.03
10	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	4	34	.471	5	1	4	0.20	18	.778	.	.	.	.	22.0	7.05
12	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	6	27	.333	5	2	4	0.40	19	.789	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.19
13	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	14	.429	9	0	4	0.00	15	.733	2	0.67	2	1.000	11.0	8.16
15	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	16	.375	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.49
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	4	27	.556	5	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.54
19	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	20	.250	4	1	2	0.25	14	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	5.14
22	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	7	18	.111	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.96
25	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	20	.250	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.62
29	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	2	19	.737	1	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.43
31	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	6	24	.250	7	0	3	0.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.88
36	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	14	.286	4	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.53
41	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	1	24	.500	6	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.03
44	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	5	17	.235	14	3	2	0.60	27	.926	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.89
Total		72	241	3.35	67	405	.430	103	13	40	0.18	286	.860	3	0.04	6	.500	272.0	6.48

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	9	2.19	16	2	.875	19.0	9.13
3	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	11	2.10	21	1	.952	20.5	7.41
5	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	12	2.20	25	1	.960	13.0	7.84
6	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	16	2.12	33	4	.879	19.5	6.22
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	1.95	21	1	.952	9.0	4.60
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	16	2.14	29	5	.828	12.5	7.03
10	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	13	2.17	29	2	.931	22.0	7.05
12	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	14	2.26	31	2	.935	17.5	6.19
13	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	11	2.53	17	0	1.000	11.0	8.16
15	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	11	2.50	16	1	.938	8.0	6.49
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	9	2.00	27	2	.926	20.5	7.54
19	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	16	2.15	34	3	.912	12.0	5.14
22	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	17	2.30	27	2	.926	9.0	5.96
25	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	9	2.00	19	3	.842	9.5	5.62
29	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	16	2.14	36	3	.917	16.5	6.43
31	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	14	2.00	37	2	.946	13.0	5.88
36	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	5	1.59	17	4	.765	10.0	4.53
41	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	1	0.25	10	2.21	24	0	1.000	16.5	7.03
44	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	6	1.20	17	2.16	32	3	.906	13.0	4.89
Total		72	0	36	36	3	0.50	63	0.88	232	2.14	491	41	.916	272.0	6.48