Players

Career Honors

S142nd All-SEC

S153rd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	8	2.00	14	.571	0.0	8.73
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	16	6	2	2.00	20	.900	3	1.00	5	.600	6.0	7.28
7	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	0	3	0.00	20	.850	3	0.60	5	.600	0.0	6.60
8	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.25	13	.846	6	1.50	11	.545	1.0	8.24
10	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	7	2.33	7	1.000	2.0	5.98
11	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	3	2	1.00	12	.833	5	1.67	6	.833	3.0	9.42
13	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	2	0.20	21	.905	6	1.20	11	.545	1.0	7.38
16	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.25	17	.882	6	1.50	8	.750	1.0	4.04
19	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	2	1	0.67	17	.941	3	1.00	5	.600	2.0	8.61
23	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	2	0.00	12	.833	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	10.00
27	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	1	0.25	16	.938	3	0.75	6	.500	1.0	7.85
31	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	5	3	1.25	19	.842	5	1.25	7	.714	5.0	6.98
32	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	4	2	1.33	16	.875	4	1.33	4	1.000	4.0	8.23
36	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2	3	0.67	17	.824	3	1.00	4	.750	2.0	10.00
37	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.20	19	.947	3	0.60	4	.750	1.0	6.00
41	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	5	1.67	6	.833	1.0	6.54
42	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	5	0.67	12	.583	0	0.00	1	.000	2.0	4.85
44	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	3	0.40	18	.833	10	2.00	12	.833	2.0	8.17
46	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	1	0.50	20	.950	4	1.00	7	.571	2.0	6.70
Total		71	.	.	.	.	.	127	36	37	0.51	301	.877	88	1.24	130	.677	36.0	7.45

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	11	2.85	13	0	1.000	0.0	8.73
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	2.36	11	0	1.000	6.0	7.28
7	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	11	2.32	22	1	.955	0.0	6.60
8	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	13	2.93	14	0	1.000	1.0	8.24
10	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	5	2.00	10	1	.900	2.0	5.98
11	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	12	2.53	17	0	1.000	3.0	9.42
13	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	12	2.35	20	0	1.000	1.0	7.38
16	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	9	2.06	18	1	.944	1.0	4.04
19	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	8	2.60	10	0	1.000	2.0	8.61
23	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	15	5.00	3	2.75	4	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
27	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	15	2.50	24	1	.958	1.0	7.85
31	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	14	2.33	27	1	.963	5.0	6.98
32	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	10	2.35	17	1	.941	4.0	8.23
36	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	16	5.33	8	2.60	10	0	1.000	2.0	10.00
37	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	9	2.13	15	3	.800	1.0	6.00
41	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	2	2.00	4	0	1.000	1.0	6.54
42	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	8	2.42	12	1	.917	2.0	4.85
44	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	14	2.52	21	0	1.000	2.0	8.17
46	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	8	2.38	13	0	1.000	2.0	6.70
Total		71	.	.	.	.	.	167	2.35	178	2.41	282	10	.965	36.0	7.45