Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	2	9	.111	8	2	4	0.40	19	.789	36	7.20	86	.419	7.0	4.77
6	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	3	.000	9	1	3	0.20	22	.864	51	10.20	113	.451	3.0	6.23
9	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	8	2	2	0.67	14	.857	26	8.67	78	.333	2.0	4.50
12	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	21	7.00	61	.344	0.0	1.80
15	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	9	.444	10	1	1	0.20	23	.957	50	10.00	96	.521	7.0	6.43
17	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	35	11.67	71	.493	1.0	6.14
21	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	4	.500	1	0	3	0.00	13	.769	45	11.25	85	.529	3.0	6.14
25	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	8	.250	0	0	1	0.00	8	.875	33	11.00	52	.635	3.5	5.98
26	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	4	0	4	0.00	13	.692	35	11.67	67	.522	0.0	5.56
30	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	27	9.00	56	.482	1.0	3.36
Total		37	14	0.38	5	48	.188	44	6	21	0.16	140	.850	359	9.70	765	.469	27.5	5.09

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.77
6	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.23
9	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.50
12	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.80
15	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.43
17	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	6.14
21	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.14
25	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	5.98
26	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	5.56
30	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.36
Total		37	0	15	15	3	0.41	43	1.16	.	.	.	.	.	27.5	5.09