Players

Nicholas Gardner 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	17	15	16	11	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	23	5.75	5	34	.529	6	0	3	0.00	14	.786	.	.	.	.	23.0	8.57
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	3	25	.480	12	2	6	0.50	23	.739	0	0.00	1	.000	18.0	8.56
4	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	24	4.80	5	36	.528	5	1	4	0.20	16	.750	.	.	.	.	28.0	8.49
6	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	14	.571	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	9.5	5.94
8	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	12	.083	8	1	4	0.33	15	.733	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.24
9	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	20	4.00	6	38	.368	4	0	4	0.00	14	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	20.5	7.14
10	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	6	24	.292	3	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.82
13	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	7	28	.321	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	1	0.25	1	1.000	17.0	7.17
14	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	27	.481	9	0	2	0.00	20	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	18.5	7.76
21	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	16	.625	11	4	2	1.33	17	.882	.	.	.	.	15.5	8.17
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	18	.500	4	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	13.0	9.08
26	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	16	.250	6	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.04
31	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	6	28	.500	3	1	4	0.20	16	.750	1	0.20	1	1.000	24.0	8.07
36	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	15	.133	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.09
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	15	.200	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.90
41	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	21	4.20	4	30	.567	4	2	2	0.40	16	.875	1	0.20	1	1.000	24.0	7.63
44	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	15	.400	5	2	1	0.67	10	.900	1	0.33	3	.333	10.5	6.83
46	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	6	22	.273	7	1	0	0.25	15	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.08
Total		69	247	3.58	75	413	.416	96	17	39	0.25	249	.843	4	0.06	10	.400	285.0	7.14

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	9	2.36	14	1	.929	23.0	8.57
3	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	11	2.42	19	0	1.000	18.0	8.56
4	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	1	0.20	25	2.44	41	0	1.000	28.0	8.49
6	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	7	2.16	19	1	.947	9.5	5.94
8	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	5	2.22	9	1	.889	7.0	5.24
9	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	19	2.16	38	1	.974	20.5	7.14
10	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	10	2.17	18	2	.889	15.0	7.82
13	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	9	2.22	18	1	.944	17.0	7.17
14	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	21	2.54	28	0	1.000	18.5	7.76
21	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	6	2.44	9	0	1.000	15.5	8.17
25	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	7	2.88	8	0	1.000	13.0	9.08
26	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	7	1.75	10	2.15	20	2	.900	11.5	5.04
31	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	3	0.60	15	2.41	27	0	1.000	24.0	8.07
36	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	13	2.56	18	1	.944	6.0	4.09
39	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	6	2.25	12	0	1.000	10.0	5.90
41	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	12	2.35	20	2	.900	24.0	7.63
44	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	10	2.56	16	0	1.000	10.5	6.83
46	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	12	2.63	16	0	1.000	14.0	7.08
Total		69	0	42	42	0	0.61	70	1.01	207	2.37	350	12	.966	285.0	7.14