Players

Career Honors

S143rd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

S152nd All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	4	1.33	8	.500	0.0	9.41
6	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.33	11	.909	6	2.00	6	1.000	1.0	8.77
7	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	3	0.20	19	.842	5	1.00	9	.556	1.0	6.66
8	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	1	0.00	16	.938	5	1.25	7	.714	0.0	6.30
10	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	1	1	0.33	16	.938	5	1.67	6	.833	1.0	8.94
11	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	2	0.67	3	.667	1.0	9.29
13	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	2	0.25	16	.875	3	0.75	7	.429	1.0	7.76
15	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	7	.857	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	7.35
18	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.25	15	.867	5	1.25	9	.556	1.0	7.24
19	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	7	1.75	11	.636	0.0	8.61
22	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	4	1.33	6	.667	1.0	6.78
23	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	11	.909	6	1.50	12	.500	0.0	9.14
25	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	3	0.20	13	.769	10	2.00	16	.625	1.0	6.26
27	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	1	3	0.25	19	.842	7	1.75	8	.875	1.0	6.62
29	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	11	3.67	15	.733	1.0	10.00
30	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	0	1	0.00	16	.938	3	0.75	3	1.000	0.0	5.80
34	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	6	0.20	22	.727	6	1.20	9	.667	1.0	4.88
35	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	3	0.00	15	.800	8	1.60	13	.615	0.0	6.49
40	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.20	14	.857	8	1.60	13	.615	1.0	7.79
45	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	3	1.00	4	.750	1.0	5.78
Total		77	.	.	.	.	.	109	13	33	0.17	270	.878	110	1.43	171	.643	13.0	7.49

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	7	2.67	9	0	1.000	0.0	9.41
6	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	2.63	8	0	1.000	1.0	8.77
7	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	13	2.63	16	1	.938	1.0	6.66
8	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	11	2.10	20	3	.850	0.0	6.30
10	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	10	2.83	12	0	1.000	1.0	8.94
11	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	11	2.85	13	0	1.000	1.0	9.29
13	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	12	2.39	18	2	.889	1.0	7.76
15	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	4	2.00	9	1	.889	0.0	7.35
18	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	12	2.65	17	0	1.000	1.0	7.24
19	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	11	2.69	16	0	1.000	0.0	8.61
22	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	2.36	11	0	1.000	1.0	6.78
23	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	6	2.67	9	0	1.000	0.0	9.14
25	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	9	2.22	18	1	.944	1.0	6.26
27	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	12	2.35	20	1	.950	1.0	6.62
29	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	10	2.54	13	1	.923	1.0	10.00
30	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	8	2.06	17	1	.941	0.0	5.80
34	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	6	2.24	17	0	1.000	1.0	4.88
35	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	9	2.35	17	1	.941	0.0	6.49
40	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	14	2.45	22	1	.955	1.0	7.79
45	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	2.09	11	2	.818	1.0	5.78
Total		77	.	.	.	.	.	156	2.03	182	2.42	293	15	.949	13.0	7.49