Players

Elliot Hamlin 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	16	13	16	16

Season 13 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
986 15th	24 339th	39 16th	78 104th	50 126th

Career Honors

S14MVP SEC1st All-SEC

S152nd All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 13)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	2	4	-.250	3	1	4	0.25	15	.733	31	7.75	81	.383	2.5	3.32
6	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	9	.000	2	1	1	0.25	12	.917	34	8.50	82	.415	4.5	4.80
7	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	13	4	3	1.33	20	.850	33	11.00	51	.647	6.5	7.77
8	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	6	0	2	0.00	20	.900	65	13.00	106	.613	1.0	7.44
10	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	3	2	2	0.67	12	.833	31	10.33	65	.477	3.0	4.70
12	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	5	.000	4	0	3	0.00	11	.727	42	14.00	56	.750	1.5	8.94
14	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	8	2	2	0.67	15	.867	38	12.67	56	.679	4.5	9.80
16	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	5	1	2	0.25	17	.882	49	12.25	75	.653	3.0	7.22
18	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	16	1	0	0.33	22	1.000	39	13.00	53	.736	4.0	9.94
19	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	6	.000	9	4	4	0.80	24	.833	63	12.60	96	.656	8.0	8.48
21	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	13	3	0	1.00	21	1.000	34	11.33	65	.523	4.5	7.61
22	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	7	.571	11	2	3	0.50	22	.864	45	11.25	74	.608	8.0	8.28
25	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	3	1.000	3	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	41	13.67	55	.745	5.0	8.99
26	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	4	1	2	0.33	13	.846	41	13.67	55	.745	2.0	8.83
30	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	2	.000	2	2	3	0.67	11	.727	43	14.33	60	.717	3.5	7.98
32	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	3	.333	3	2	2	0.50	16	.875	57	14.25	96	.594	5.0	8.90
34	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	13	4	2	1.33	20	.900	42	14.00	66	.636	4.5	8.85
35	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	41	13.67	59	.695	3.5	9.50
39	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	7	.143	8	1	0	0.25	19	1.000	57	14.25	78	.731	3.5	9.02
40	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	6	.000	7	1	7	0.20	21	.667	54	10.80	92	.587	2.0	4.74
44	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	4	.000	7	2	2	0.40	21	.905	53	10.60	89	.596	2.5	5.38
45	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	4	.250	13	3	3	0.60	24	.875	53	10.60	83	.639	7.5	7.20
Total		82	24	0.29	11	88	.148	158	39	48	0.48	380	.874	986	12.02	1593	.619	90.0	7.62

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 13)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.32
6	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.80
7	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	9	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.77
8	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	7.44
10	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.70
12	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.94
14	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	9.80
16	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.22
18	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.94
19	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	2	2	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.48
21	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.61
22	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.28
25	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.99
26	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.83
30	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.98
32	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.90
34	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.85
35	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.50
39	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.02
40	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.74
44	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	2	0.20	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.38
45	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.20
Total		82	4	46	50	5	0.61	78	0.95	.	.	.	.	.	90.0	7.62