Players

Matt Saracen 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	17	16	16	17	6

Career Honors

S143rd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

S152nd All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	14	-.071	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	2	0.67	2	1.000	5.0	3.83
4	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	12	.500	7	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.74
5	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	6	.333	0	0	0	0.00	4	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	3.0	2.96
7	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	8	23	.000	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	8.0	4.34
11	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	16	.375	8	2	2	0.67	12	.833	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.23
12	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	12	-.083	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	1.34
13	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	11	21	-.238	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.57
15	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	10	2	2	0.67	17	.882	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.08
18	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	9	30	.067	2	0	3	0.00	14	.786	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	4.47
21	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	19	6.33	7	32	.375	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.90
26	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	6	30	.267	3	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.50
29	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	18	.611	4	0	1	0.00	11	.909	1	0.33	1	1.000	14.0	8.70
30	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	6	19	.053	5	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.77
34	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	16	.250	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.74
35	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	8	29	.103	11	3	5	0.75	21	.762	1	0.25	1	1.000	15.0	7.24
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	15	-.067	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	1	0.33	2	.500	6.0	3.31
40	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	8	19	.053	3	0	2	0.00	15	.867	1	0.25	1	1.000	10.0	5.37
44	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	24	.292	3	1	5	0.20	14	.643	.	.	.	.	13.5	4.38
45	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	14	.071	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	5.0	1.34
Total		64	157	2.45	98	360	.164	73	12	33	0.19	214	.846	6	0.09	10	.600	182.0	4.88

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	2.22	9	1	.889	5.0	3.83
4	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	1.91	22	2	.909	7.0	4.74
5	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	2.26	19	0	1.000	3.0	2.96
7	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	10	2.00	22	3	.864	8.0	4.34
11	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	12	2.35	17	2	.882	12.0	7.23
12	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	11	1.73	30	7	.767	4.0	1.34
13	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	17	2.11	35	4	.886	6.5	3.57
15	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	6	2.00	15	2.33	24	1	.958	7.5	5.08
18	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	12	2.16	25	1	.960	13.0	4.47
21	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	1.89	19	2	.895	19.0	6.90
26	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	5	1.25	20	2.28	32	3	.906	16.0	7.50
29	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	6	2.40	10	0	1.000	14.0	8.70
30	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	10	2.29	17	1	.941	10.0	5.77
34	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	10	2.09	23	1	.957	7.5	4.74
35	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	11	2.75	13	2.33	24	0	1.000	15.0	7.24
39	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	2.18	17	2	.882	6.0	3.31
40	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	22	2.41	34	1	.971	10.0	5.37
44	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	19	2.22	36	3	.917	13.5	4.38
45	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	8	1.70	20	6	.700	5.0	1.34
Total		64	0	26	26	6	0.41	67	1.05	224	2.15	435	40	.908	182.0	4.88