Players

Gil Gunderson 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	16	14	10	-

Career Honors

S142nd All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	6	.667	5	2	2	0.67	11	.818	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.30
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	0	15	.733	13	4	2	1.33	19	.895	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.30
7	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	12	.500	6	2	3	0.40	20	.850	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.79
9	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	10	.500	4	2	0	0.50	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.38
10	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	3	18	.500	4	2	3	0.50	14	.786	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.18
11	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	11	.818	9	1	2	0.33	14	.857	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.86
14	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	4	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.18
16	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	13	.308	6	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.89
19	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	8	.875	10	3	1	1.00	14	.929	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.76
20	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	3	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.06
23	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	12	.583	10	3	1	0.75	19	.947	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.44
24	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	14	.429	4	1	2	0.25	12	.833	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.39
31	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	12	.667	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.59
32	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	19	.211	8	1	4	0.25	16	.750	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.33
36	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	14	.357	2	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.28
37	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	14	.786	5	2	2	0.50	15	.867	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.93
42	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	1	12	.583	3	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.68
44	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	8	.250	5	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.13
47	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	2	16	.750	2	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.68
Total		69	160	2.32	31	234	.551	107	25	40	0.36	254	.843	.	.	.	.	219.0	7.01

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.30
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.30
7	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	1	4	5	1	1.00	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.79
9	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.38
10	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.18
11	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.86
14	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.18
16	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.89
19	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	8.76
20	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.06
23	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.44
24	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.39
31	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.59
32	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.33
36	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.28
37	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.93
42	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	1	9	10	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.68
44	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.13
47	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.68
Total		69	5	58	63	7	0.91	21	0.30	.	.	.	.	.	219.0	7.01