Players

Rutger Watson 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	13	14	15	13	4

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	21	.143	10	2	6	0.50	17	.647	1	0.25	2	.500	9.5	5.25
2	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	13	.154	2	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	4.0	1.96
4	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	12	.250	2	1	2	0.33	7	.714	0	0.00	2	.000	10.0	3.33
6	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	20	.050	7	0	2	0.00	13	.846	0	0.00	1	.000	5.5	3.45
10	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	20	.150	3	1	0	0.20	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	2.21
11	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	10	.300	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.41
13	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	5	21	.048	6	0	0	0.00	18	1.000	1	0.25	2	.500	7.0	4.25
15	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	26	.385	12	0	3	0.00	23	.870	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.75
17	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	5	25	.360	5	2	4	0.40	14	.714	1	0.20	1	1.000	17.5	5.52
18	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	16	-.063	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	5.0	4.19
21	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	8	.625	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.81
22	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	6	25	.200	2	0	4	0.00	11	.636	0	0.00	1	.000	11.5	3.71
25	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	7	19	-.053	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	6.0	2.46
26	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	6	23	.217	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	0	0.00	1	.000	11.5	5.98
29	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	11	.000	3	0	2	0.00	8	.750	0	0.00	1	.000	3.0	1.70
Total		55	104	1.89	56	270	.178	59	6	34	0.11	166	.795	3	0.05	13	.231	128.0	3.93

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	5	1.25	9	2.24	21	1	.952	9.5	5.25
2	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	10	1.88	24	5	.792	4.0	1.96
4	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	8	8	0	2.67	6	2.00	4	1.64	14	3	.786	10.0	3.33
6	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	5	1.76	17	3	.824	5.5	3.45
10	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	16	1.82	39	7	.821	10.0	2.21
11	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	3	1.00	9	2.12	17	2	.882	5.0	3.41
13	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	11	2.20	25	1	.960	7.0	4.25
15	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0	1	1	0.25	14	3.50	12	2.19	26	1	.962	14.0	7.75
17	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	15	2.03	32	4	.875	17.5	5.52
18	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	8	2.28	18	0	1.000	5.0	4.19
21	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	9	2.00	22	3	.864	8.5	3.81
22	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	19	2.03	39	5	.872	11.5	3.71
25	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	1.86	22	5	.773	6.0	2.46
26	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	9	2.25	20	2.18	40	2	.950	11.5	5.98
29	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	10	1.71	31	6	.806	3.0	1.70
Total		55	2	32	34	3	0.62	73	1.33	166	2.00	387	48	.876	128.0	3.93