Players

Eamon Brink 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	14	13	15	12	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	17	.118	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.29
5	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	8	26	-.077	3	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	2.10
8	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	20	.250	0	0	0	0.00	4	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.72
11	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	13	.154	1	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.05
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	23	.087	1	0	3	0.00	6	.500	0	0.00	1	.000	7.0	3.15
17	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	22	-.045	4	0	2	0.00	9	.778	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.5	2.29
18	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	11	.545	1	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	0	0.00	2	.000	6.0	2.96
21	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	12	.250	2	1	0	0.33	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.36
25	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	7	.143	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	1	0.33	2	.500	4.0	1.44
26	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	8	-.125	3	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.92
29	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	8	20	.050	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.08
36	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	22	.318	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	10.5	2.96
39	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	14	.357	3	1	0	0.25	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.56
41	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	2	20	.450	8	1	3	0.20	17	.824	1	0.20	1	1.000	12.5	3.45
44	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	6	.167	5	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.0	2.71
46	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	13	.000	6	2	4	0.50	14	.714	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.36
Total		54	93	1.72	53	254	.157	42	6	23	0.11	136	.831	3	0.06	7	.429	110.0	3.09

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	6	2.00	10	1.85	26	5	.808	7.0	3.29
5	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	6	1.67	21	2	.905	6.0	2.10
8	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	13	2.00	26	4	.846	8.0	4.72
11	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	8	1.71	24	5	.792	5.0	2.05
15	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	12	1.83	23	6	.739	7.0	3.15
17	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	9	1.65	26	6	.769	5.5	2.29
18	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.05	20	0	1.000	6.0	2.96
21	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	6	2.18	11	1	.909	8.0	4.36
25	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	1.59	27	7	.741	4.0	1.44
26	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	13	1.92	26	6	.769	2.5	2.92
29	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	1.64	28	6	.786	9.0	4.08
36	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	15	1.91	33	5	.848	10.5	2.96
39	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	17	2.13	30	4	.867	9.0	3.56
41	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	11	1.77	35	6	.829	12.5	3.45
44	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	5	1.57	21	6	.714	4.0	2.71
46	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	6	1.50	9	1.89	27	3	.889	6.0	3.36
Total		54	0	22	22	2	0.41	50	0.93	162	1.83	404	72	.822	110.0	3.09