Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	8	.000	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	28	9.33	64	.438	0.5	4.46
5	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	4	.500	5	1	3	0.20	17	.824	43	8.60	97	.443	6.0	5.03
6	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	2	7	-.143	8	3	5	0.75	17	.706	26	6.50	87	.299	6.0	3.88
7	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	14	4.67	52	.269	1.0	1.92
11	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	18	6.00	53	.340	1.5	2.31
14	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	7	-.143	0	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	31	10.33	71	.437	0.0	3.80
18	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	27	9.00	66	.409	0.0	3.24
31	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	22	7.33	64	.344	2.0	3.84
38	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	3	-.667	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	37	12.33	75	.493	0.5	6.98
Total		30	6	0.20	7	42	-.024	30	4	17	0.13	97	.825	246	8.20	629	.391	17.5	3.94

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	4.46
5	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	2	2	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.03
6	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.88
7	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.92
11	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.31
14	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	3.80
18	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	3.24
31	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.84
38	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	6.98
Total		30	3	9	12	2	0.40	27	0.90	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	3.94