Players

Sam Cunningham 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	15	12	13	10	7

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	26	.423	7	2	3	0.50	15	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	17.5	7.19
2	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	9	35	.114	4	1	1	0.25	11	.909	0	0.00	2	.000	14.0	6.83
4	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	13	.308	5	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.23
7	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	7	21	-.048	3	1	2	0.33	7	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	7.0	3.35
10	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	7	24	-.042	6	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	7.0	4.32
11	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	22	.182	4	0	3	0.00	15	.800	0	0.00	2	.000	8.0	4.50
14	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	8	23	-.043	2	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.41
15	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	23	4.60	7	40	.400	4	0	3	0.00	19	.842	.	.	.	.	24.0	8.70
17	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	10	-.200	6	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.74
19	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	19	.105	7	1	2	0.25	18	.889	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.12
26	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	18	.722	5	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.40
30	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	3	26	.462	5	0	1	0.00	15	.933	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.73
33	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	4	24	.375	2	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	7.36
34	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	16	5.33	5	26	.423	5	2	2	0.67	13	.846	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.59
35	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	26	.500	6	0	3	0.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	16.5	5.95
39	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	22	.318	3	0	1	0.00	14	.929	2	0.50	5	.400	11.0	5.33
40	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	20	.150	4	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.54
44	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	15	5.00	6	27	.333	2	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.83
45	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	27	5.40	1	36	.722	2	1	1	0.20	15	.933	.	.	.	.	30.0	7.75
Total		68	223	3.28	84	458	.303	82	10	29	0.15	240	.879	2	0.03	13	.154	251.0	6.15

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	16	2.09	33	3	.909	17.5	7.19
2	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	20	2.43	30	2	.933	14.0	6.83
4	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	6	2.50	10	0	1.000	6.0	5.23
7	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	10	2.15	20	0	1.000	7.0	3.35
10	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	14	2.33	24	1	.958	7.0	4.32
11	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	6	1.50	18	2.39	31	1	.968	8.0	4.50
14	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	12	2.61	18	0	1.000	7.0	5.41
15	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	9	1.80	15	2.60	20	0	1.000	24.0	8.70
17	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	6	2.00	5	2.00	11	0	1.000	4.5	4.74
19	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	1	0.25	23	2.29	41	3	.927	8.0	4.12
26	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	1	2.00	2	0.67	6	2.15	13	0	1.000	17.0	8.40
30	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	3	0.75	20	2.38	32	1	.969	16.5	7.73
33	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	15	2.27	26	1	.962	13.5	7.36
34	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	18	2.15	33	6	.818	18.5	7.59
35	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	9	1.72	29	7	.759	16.5	5.95
39	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	23	2.31	36	4	.889	11.0	5.33
40	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	11	1.75	28	7	.750	8.5	4.54
44	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	16	2.50	24	1	.958	16.5	7.83
45	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	16	2.19	36	2	.944	30.0	7.75
Total		68	2	32	34	4	0.50	63	0.93	273	2.24	495	39	.921	251.0	6.15