Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	14	.429	0.0	4.16
2	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	2.95
3	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	5.30
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	1	2	0.33	17	.882	7	2.33	10	.700	1.0	2.06
7	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	3.25
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	2	0.00	5	.600	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	1.70
19	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	2.95
30	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	2.60
Total		25	.	.	.	.	.	11	1	4	0.04	22	.818	21	0.84	48	.438	1.0	3.12

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	8	1.68	22	6	.727	0.0	4.16
2	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	1.59	32	7	.781	0.0	2.95
3	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	13	2.17	23	3	.870	0.0	5.30
5	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	6	1.40	25	7	.720	1.0	2.06
7	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	1.73	26	3	.885	0.0	3.25
13	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.59	17	5	.706	0.0	1.70
19	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	11	1.96	26	3	.885	0.0	2.95
30	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	1.55	20	6	.700	0.0	2.60
Total		25	.	.	.	.	.	28	1.12	71	1.71	191	40	.791	1.0	3.12