Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	8	.125	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	27	9.00	76	.355	3.0	4.79
6	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	4	.500	8	1	4	0.25	17	.765	38	9.50	91	.418	5.0	6.44
8	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	1	-1.000	5	0	2	0.00	12	.833	28	9.33	73	.384	0.0	4.16
9	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	5	.000	10	0	4	0.00	24	.833	44	8.80	114	.386	1.0	4.74
12	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	29	9.67	61	.475	0.0	3.90
15	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	6	0	1	0.00	14	.929	33	11.00	71	.465	2.5	6.84
Total		21	5	0.24	3	26	.077	34	1	12	0.05	85	.859	199	9.48	486	.409	11.5	5.15

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.79
6	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.44
8	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	4.16
9	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.74
12	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	3.90
15	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.84
Total		21	0	11	11	1	0.52	18	0.86	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.15