Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	8	.000	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.32
5	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	18	.111	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.64
9	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	4	22	.045	3	0	5	0.00	12	.583	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.66
12	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	7	.429	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.36
14	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	9	.000	8	1	2	0.25	16	.875	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.97
18	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	15	.000	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.64
29	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	3	13	.077	6	2	1	0.50	13	.923	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.21
33	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	7	14	-.286	2	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.34
Total		28	28	1.00	25	106	.028	28	4	15	0.14	84	.821	.	.	.	.	42.0	5.02

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	5.32
5	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.64
9	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.66
12	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.36
14	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	8	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.97
18	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.64
29	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	2	2	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.21
33	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.34
Total		28	2	16	18	1	0.64	36	1.29	.	.	.	.	.	42.0	5.02