Players

Stanley Thompson 5 Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	-	13	13	12	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	15	.467	10	0	2	0.00	19	.895	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.05
3	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	7	25	-.040	6	0	2	0.00	16	.875	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.72
7	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	15	.333	7	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.03
10	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	11	.000	0	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.30
14	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	4	.500	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.76
15	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	4	8	-.250	4	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.20
17	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	15	.267	6	3	1	0.60	13	.923	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.49
18	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	13	.615	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.14
21	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	3	12	.333	4	0	5	0.00	14	.643	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.86
24	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	16	.313	2	1	2	0.20	13	.846	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.72
25	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	10	.100	1	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.34
26	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	2	10	.200	7	1	2	0.20	17	.882	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.75
29	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	19	.368	8	0	2	0.00	19	.895	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.05
Total		53	79	1.49	37	173	.243	63	7	25	0.13	174	.856	.	.	.	.	102.0	5.57

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mendon W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.05
3	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.72
7	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.03
10	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.30
14	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.76
15	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.20
17	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.49
18	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.14
21	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.86
24	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.72
25	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.34
26	Tucson L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.75
29	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.05
Total		53	1	30	31	2	0.58	60	1.13	.	.	.	.	.	102.0	5.57