Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	5	.600	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	6.03
4	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	4.85
9	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	4	0.00	15	.733	6	1.20	13	.462	0.0	4.35
12	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	2	0.50	15	.867	4	1.00	10	.400	2.0	6.43
15	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	7	.571	0.0	3.60
16	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	3.15
17	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	8	.125	0.0	2.05
21	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	3	0.20	16	.813	2	0.40	4	.500	1.0	5.95
30	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	1	0.25	4	.250	0.0	3.00
Total		34	.	.	.	.	.	19	3	11	0.09	66	.833	27	0.79	61	.443	3.0	4.38

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	10	2.09	22	1	.955	0.0	6.03
4	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.08	25	1	.960	0.0	4.85
9	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	12	1.92	26	4	.846	0.0	4.35
12	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	11	2.04	24	2	.917	2.0	6.43
15	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	13	1.82	38	6	.842	0.0	3.60
16	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	12	1.86	28	5	.821	0.0	3.15
17	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	8	1.73	22	5	.773	0.0	2.05
21	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	16	2.08	36	5	.861	1.0	5.95
30	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	15	1.97	35	4	.886	0.0	3.00
Total		34	.	.	.	.	.	50	1.47	108	1.95	256	33	.871	3.0	4.38