Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	8	-.250	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	21	7.00	65	.323	0.5	2.38
5	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	2	0	4	0.00	9	.556	30	10.00	71	.423	3.5	6.00
10	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	6	.167	4	1	1	0.33	12	.917	39	13.00	66	.591	2.0	7.28
13	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	4	2	3	0.67	13	.769	34	11.33	79	.430	4.0	6.86
15	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	6	2	2	0.67	14	.857	38	12.67	70	.543	4.5	9.50
18	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	5	-.200	0	0	1	0.00	8	.875	28	9.33	62	.452	2.0	4.55
19	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	7	.143	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	22	7.33	61	.361	3.5	3.58
25	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	28	9.33	73	.384	1.5	5.04
26	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	5	2	4	0.67	13	.692	26	8.67	65	.400	7.0	6.16
29	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	3	0	1	0.00	11	.909	33	11.00	82	.402	1.0	5.37
36	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	12	2	2	0.67	18	.889	36	12.00	62	.581	6.0	9.15
Total		33	11	0.33	8	48	.063	40	9	23	0.27	122	.811	335	10.15	756	.443	35.5	5.99

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	2.38
5	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	3	4	1	1.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.00
10	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.28
13	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.86
15	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	9.50
18	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.55
19	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.58
25	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	5.04
26	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	2	2	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.16
29	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	5.37
36	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	9.15
Total		33	4	23	27	1	0.82	32	0.97	.	.	.	.	.	35.5	5.99