Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	2	.000	11	2	2	0.50	20	.900	30	7.50	97	.309	3.5	4.80
4	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	28	9.33	64	.438	1.5	4.90
7	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	6	.167	8	1	4	0.25	18	.778	37	9.25	85	.435	2.0	4.38
11	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	4	.000	5	0	4	0.00	16	.750	42	8.40	88	.477	1.0	3.66
14	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	6	.333	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	33	11.00	66	.500	3.5	6.26
15	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	6	.167	11	3	1	0.60	23	.957	41	8.20	96	.427	5.5	5.01
17	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	7	.143	10	3	5	0.60	24	.792	47	9.40	94	.500	6.5	5.62
29	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	3	1	0	0.33	11	1.000	33	11.00	60	.550	2.0	5.02
34	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	4	1	1	0.33	12	.917	30	10.00	63	.476	2.0	4.62
Total		35	9	0.26	3	37	.162	56	11	23	0.31	143	.839	321	9.17	713	.450	27.5	4.92

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.80
4	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.90
7	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.38
11	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.66
14	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.26
15	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	10	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.01
17	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.62
29	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.02
34	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.62
Total		35	1	13	14	3	0.40	36	1.03	.	.	.	.	.	27.5	4.92