Players

Sam Vimes 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	17	15	17	16	6

Season 14 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
281 30th	.513 51st	16 146th	72 145th	49 132nd

Career Honors

S151st All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

S162nd All-TMVL1st All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	0	14	.857	5	1	2	0.33	10	.800	1	0.33	2	.500	16.5	8.94
3	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	4	25	.480	6	1	1	0.20	18	.944	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.40
4	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	21	.333	4	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.43
6	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	17	.412	7	2	1	0.67	12	.917	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.80
11	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	16	.500	3	2	2	0.67	10	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	12.5	4.86
12	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	8	35	.314	5	1	1	0.25	14	.929	2	0.50	2	1.000	22.0	8.27
15	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	18	.278	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.98
16	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	12	.333	1	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.39
18	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	17	.471	6	0	1	0.00	13	.923	1	0.33	3	.333	11.5	8.32
19	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	1	25	.680	1	0	4	0.00	13	.692	1	0.25	2	.500	19.5	7.71
22	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	18	.222	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	9.0	6.18
25	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	17	5.67	4	23	.565	4	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.99
26	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	4	27	.407	12	2	6	0.40	23	.739	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.63
30	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	16	5.33	2	18	.778	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	16.5	9.01
32	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	21	5.25	2	25	.760	4	0	5	0.00	16	.688	.	.	.	.	24.0	8.42
34	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	20	.400	9	1	1	0.33	18	.944	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.54
35	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	2	22	.591	2	2	1	0.50	14	.929	.	.	.	.	18.5	7.01
39	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	3	18	.333	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.13
40	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	15	.533	7	1	0	0.33	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.45
44	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	23	4.60	2	28	.750	0	0	1	0.00	12	.917	1	0.20	1	1.000	23.5	6.11
45	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	17	4.25	1	23	.696	3	0	4	0.00	14	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	18.5	8.46
Total		74	281	3.80	57	437	.513	89	16	33	0.22	271	.878	7	0.09	13	.538	322.5	7.00

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	0	2.33	6	2.00	7	2.17	12	1	.917	16.5	8.94
3	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	22	2.24	41	2	.951	17.5	6.40
4	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	8	2.21	14	1	.929	9.0	5.43
6	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	7	1.95	21	1	.952	11.5	5.80
11	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	1	1.43	7	1	.857	12.5	4.86
12	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	16	2.17	30	4	.867	22.0	8.27
15	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.18	17	2	.882	10.0	5.98
16	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	8	2.11	18	1	.944	9.0	4.39
18	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	4	2.57	7	0	1.000	11.5	8.32
19	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	11	2.26	19	2	.895	19.5	7.71
22	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	10	2.44	18	0	1.000	9.0	6.18
25	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	5	2.22	9	1	.889	19.5	8.99
26	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	8	1.60	16	2.65	20	1	.950	17.5	7.63
30	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	7	2.55	11	0	1.000	16.5	9.01
32	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	2	0.50	5	2.18	11	0	1.000	24.0	8.42
34	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	5	2.08	13	1	.923	13.5	7.54
35	Denali L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	12	2.26	19	2	.895	18.5	7.01
39	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	3	1.91	11	0	1.000	11.5	6.13
40	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	3	1.50	14	3	.786	11.5	5.45
44	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	2	0.40	16	1.95	37	4	.892	23.5	6.11
45	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	14	2.50	20	1	.950	18.5	8.46
Total		74	2	47	49	1	0.66	72	0.97	189	2.18	369	28	.924	322.5	7.00