Players

Alex Wysocki 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	16	15	16	14	8

Season 14 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
310 11th	.482 64th	22 93rd	87 83rd	52 111th

Career Honors

S163rd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	1	19	.684	6	2	3	0.50	16	.813	1	0.25	2	.500	17.0	7.14
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	15	.533	10	3	3	1.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.27
5	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	2	20	.550	4	1	1	0.33	13	.923	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.21
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	20	6.67	3	29	.586	6	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	20.5	8.31
12	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	19	.368	14	3	1	0.75	22	.955	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.0	6.79
14	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	18	.556	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	14.0	7.27
16	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	10	44	.227	6	1	1	0.20	15	.933	3	0.60	3	1.000	22.5	7.46
19	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	26	5.20	4	36	.611	7	3	4	0.60	19	.789	3	0.60	4	.750	30.0	8.05
20	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	16	.688	5	2	3	0.50	17	.824	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.71
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	21	5.25	3	32	.563	2	0	3	0.00	12	.750	1	0.25	1	1.000	22.0	6.89
23	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	22	4.40	2	30	.667	3	2	1	0.40	14	.929	1	0.20	1	1.000	24.5	6.47
25	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	20	4.00	5	33	.455	6	1	1	0.20	16	.938	1	0.20	2	.500	22.0	6.72
26	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	15	5.00	1	21	.667	4	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	18.5	8.24
30	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	8	25	.080	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.54
32	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	2	21	.571	8	1	1	0.25	18	.944	0	0.00	1	.000	16.0	7.39
34	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	11	.545	9	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.23
37	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	16	.188	3	1	3	0.33	12	.750	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.64
39	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	6	22	.364	2	0	2	0.00	14	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	15.0	6.16
40	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	23	.348	13	1	0	0.25	23	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.5	8.42
44	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	4	20	.450	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.87
45	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	3	28	.571	6	0	3	0.00	21	.857	1	0.20	1	1.000	21.0	7.52
Total		81	310	3.83	70	498	.482	118	22	36	0.27	317	.886	13	0.16	19	.684	358.5	7.06

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 14)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	9	2.17	23	0	1.000	17.0	7.14
4	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	6	2.09	11	1	.909	13.0	7.27
5	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	11	2.35	17	1	.941	15.0	8.21
11	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	12	2.13	24	2	.917	20.5	8.31
12	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	6	1.50	9	2.35	17	1	.941	14.0	6.79
14	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	6	2.13	16	1	.938	14.0	7.27
16	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	7	1.40	18	2.00	44	5	.886	22.5	7.46
19	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	9	1.80	18	2.02	43	5	.884	30.0	8.05
20	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	16	2.35	26	2	.923	15.5	6.71
22	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	14	1.91	32	5	.844	22.0	6.89
23	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	16	1.98	41	4	.902	24.5	6.47
25	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	15	1.83	40	8	.800	22.0	6.72
26	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	9	2.09	22	1	.955	18.5	8.24
30	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	14	2.06	33	4	.879	11.5	4.54
32	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	24	2.23	39	6	.846	16.0	7.39
34	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	10	2.11	19	3	.842	8.5	6.23
37	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	13	2.27	22	3	.864	8.0	4.64
39	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	14	2.06	36	3	.917	15.0	6.16
40	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	16	2.79	19	0	1.000	14.5	8.42
44	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	17	2.33	30	2	.933	15.5	7.87
45	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	6	1.20	14	2.14	28	2	.929	21.0	7.52
Total		81	1	51	52	3	0.64	87	1.07	281	2.13	582	59	.899	358.5	7.06