Players

Gianluca Buglioni 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	16	14	10	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	8	21	-.095	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.32
3	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	8	18	-.167	3	0	4	0.00	12	.667	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.65
4	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	9	20	-.350	3	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.18
6	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	1	17	.412	7	0	2	0.00	20	.900	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.67
8	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	13	.077	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.67
9	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	4	15	.200	4	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.82
10	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	15	-.067	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.36
11	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	5	-.400	3	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.82
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
15	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	2	10	.200	7	0	2	0.00	19	.895	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.67
17	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	6	10	-.400	1	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.45
18	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	13	.385	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.28
21	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	5	16	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.33
22	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	17	.412	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.55
25	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	14	.214	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.10
26	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	19	.421	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.50
29	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	13	.462	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.24
31	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	11	.182	4	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.62
39	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	15	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.36
41	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	17	.471	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.86
44	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	1	13	.769	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.36
46	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	12	.583	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.46
Total		89	141	1.58	77	313	.204	32	3	14	0.03	104	.865	.	.	.	.	187.0	5.19

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.32
3	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.65
4	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.18
6	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.67
8	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	1	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.67
9	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	8.82
10	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.36
11	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.82
13	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.98
15	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.67
17	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.45
18	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.28
21	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.33
22	Baton Rouge L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.55
25	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	2	2	4	1	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.10
26	Manitowoc W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.50
29	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	1	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.24
31	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.62
39	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.36
41	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.86
44	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.36
46	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	3	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.46
Total		89	7	72	79	9	0.89	13	0.15	.	.	.	.	.	187.0	5.19