Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	2.60
9	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	2	0.33	7	.714	2	0.67	5	.400	1.0	3.30
15	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	9	.667	2	0.50	10	.200	0.0	6.25
17	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	3.05
18	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	3	1.00	5	.600	1.0	6.10
21	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	9	.444	0.0	4.95
25	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	5	.200	0.0	2.45
26	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	1	.000	0.0	2.35
29	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	3.65
35	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	3	1.00	5	.600	1.0	5.65
Total		34	.	.	.	.	.	15	3	9	0.09	54	.833	17	0.50	48	.354	3.0	4.04

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	1.78	23	4	.826	0.0	2.60
9	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	1.57	28	7	.750	1.0	3.30
15	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	15	2.25	28	2	.929	0.0	6.25
17	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	1.63	19	5	.737	0.0	3.05
18	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	7	2.17	18	0	1.000	1.0	6.10
21	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	13	2.23	26	2	.923	0.0	4.95
25	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	8	1.90	21	2	.905	0.0	2.45
26	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	12	1.68	34	9	.735	0.0	2.35
29	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	9	2.20	20	2	.900	0.0	3.65
35	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	12	2.09	22	2	.909	1.0	5.65
Total		34	.	.	.	.	.	49	1.44	100	1.94	239	35	.854	3.0	4.04