Players

Johnny Knoll 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	17	17	8	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	7	.286	1	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.27
3	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	1	15	.733	8	0	3	0.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.41
5	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	10	.500	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.06
6	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	21	.429	5	1	5	0.20	13	.615	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.56
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	12	.000	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	13	.308	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.53
10	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	3	22	.591	3	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.47
12	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	1	17	.706	5	1	2	0.20	16	.875	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.58
13	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	14	.714	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.68
15	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	0	15	.933	4	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	17.0	10.00
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	20	.550	3	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.49
19	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	16	.563	3	1	2	0.25	11	.818	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.33
22	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	17	.647	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.55
25	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	0	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.55
29	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	9	.556	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.88
31	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	2	22	.727	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	22.5	8.76
36	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	9	.556	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.33
41	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	14	.571	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.05
44	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	4	24	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.17
Total		72	214	2.97	43	291	.588	36	3	19	0.04	124	.847	.	.	.	.	252.0	6.69

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.27
3	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	2	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.41
5	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.06
6	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.56
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.53
10	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	2	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.47
12	San Jose L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.58
13	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	7.68
15	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	1	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	10.00
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.49
19	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.33
22	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.55
25	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.55
29	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	2.88
31	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	3	3	6	0	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	22.5	8.76
36	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.33
41	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	2	4	6	1	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.05
44	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	1	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.5	8.17
Total		72	6	58	64	9	0.89	11	0.15	.	.	.	.	.	252.0	6.69