Players

Griffin Mortenson 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	14	14	16	15	4

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	9	39	-.051	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.26
3	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	9	26	-.077	5	1	2	0.33	9	.778	1	0.33	2	.500	10.0	5.02
5	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	9	24	-.250	1	0	5	0.00	10	.500	1	0.20	2	.500	4.5	3.54
6	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	23	.130	3	1	2	0.20	11	.818	0	0.00	1	.000	11.0	2.82
7	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	7	21	.000	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.60
9	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	10	.400	7	2	1	0.67	13	.923	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.36
13	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	22	.500	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.92
15	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	23	.391	8	2	3	0.67	14	.786	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.56
18	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	17	.118	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.99
21	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	16	.188	4	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.42
26	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	2	13	.615	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.79
31	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	15	.133	0	0	2	0.00	5	.600	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.32
36	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	16	4.00	4	33	.364	1	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	17.5	6.89
41	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	21	.286	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.50
44	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	14	.286	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.97
46	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	8	.500	5	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.30
Total		54	129	2.39	71	325	.178	46	9	36	0.17	147	.755	2	0.04	5	.400	155.5	4.70

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	1.87	23	3	.870	7.0	3.26
3	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	6	2.00	8	1.81	26	3	.885	10.0	5.02
5	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	17	2.18	33	2	.939	4.5	3.54
6	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	16	1.97	35	7	.800	11.0	2.82
7	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	7	2.00	14	1	.929	8.5	4.60
9	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	3	1.33	15	3	.800	9.0	3.36
13	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	9	1.82	22	5	.773	13.0	5.92
15	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	14	2.18	28	1	.964	14.0	7.56
18	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	6	2.00	3	1.48	21	1	.952	9.0	3.99
21	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	14	2.04	28	3	.893	9.0	5.42
26	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	20	2.08	40	6	.850	11.0	4.79
31	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	2	0.67	12	2.30	20	2	.900	7.5	4.32
36	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	19	2.11	37	3	.919	17.5	6.89
41	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	14	1.84	38	7	.816	12.0	6.50
44	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	2.05	20	4	.800	7.0	2.97
46	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	8	2.18	17	2	.882	5.5	4.30
Total		54	1	33	34	4	0.63	51	0.94	182	1.97	417	53	.873	155.5	4.70