Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	9	4	2	1.33	17	.882	30	10.00	57	.526	8.0	7.05
3	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	5	.400	8	3	2	0.60	21	.905	48	9.60	88	.545	6.0	5.12
8	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	43	14.33	58	.741	2.0	8.87
9	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	6	.500	7	4	0	1.33	15	1.000	32	10.67	58	.552	8.5	7.82
10	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	10	2	0	0.67	18	1.000	37	12.33	62	.597	4.5	8.34
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	6	-.167	10	3	5	1.00	19	.737	45	15.00	61	.738	4.0	9.08
13	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	17	1	1	0.33	24	.958	39	13.00	51	.765	3.0	9.03
16	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	6	.333	7	2	2	0.40	24	.917	74	14.80	102	.725	5.0	8.62
19	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	8	2	3	0.67	16	.813	41	13.67	69	.594	4.0	9.73
20	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	8	3	2	1.00	17	.882	44	14.67	60	.733	4.0	9.10
23	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	6	.000	6	1	2	0.20	20	.900	65	13.00	95	.684	4.0	8.17
24	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	2	1.000	4	0	2	0.00	19	.895	70	17.50	110	.636	2.5	8.46
27	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	4	.000	9	3	3	0.75	21	.857	47	11.75	69	.681	4.5	6.80
32	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	3	.000	5	2	0	0.50	16	1.000	56	14.00	89	.629	2.0	7.84
37	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	8	.000	2	0	2	0.00	15	.867	63	15.75	86	.733	4.0	8.84
42	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	7	.571	8	0	3	0.00	23	.870	56	11.20	89	.629	5.0	6.92
46	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	10	.300	7	1	3	0.25	20	.850	57	14.25	83	.687	5.5	9.41
Total		64	31	0.48	8	81	.284	126	31	34	0.48	314	.892	847	13.23	1287	.658	76.5	8.19

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.05
3	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.12
8	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.87
9	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	7.82
10	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.34
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.08
13	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	9.03
16	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	8.62
19	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.73
20	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.10
23	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.17
24	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.46
27	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.80
32	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.84
37	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.84
42	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.92
46	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	9.41
Total		64	0	29	29	2	0.45	53	0.83	.	.	.	.	.	76.5	8.19